Overall I like this--enough wiggle-room to deal with situations we cannot foresee now, but still sufficient guidance for the IESGs to come. One small issue, inline. Stephan
On 9.21.2012 13:45 , "IETF Chair" <ch...@ietf.org> wrote: >[...] > >When an I-D is removed from the Public I-D Archive, a copy will be kept >in a location accessible only by the IETF Leadership and the IETF >Secretariat. It's quite likely, if there really were a court order to remove an I-D from public access, that there is also a demand to destroy any copies. The sentence above could be read that the IETF would keep a copy nevertheless. To cure this, you could insert a sentence "This copy will be removed only based on a court order or a legal request of comparable strength.". In other words, IESG common sense is enough to remove an I-D from the publicly accessible archive, but it takes a court order to remove it for good. >[...] >
