On 17 December 2012 11:54, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: >> Might I suggest, however, using -1 instead of "-" to refer to the last item >> in an >> array, as this provides two benefits: >> >> 1) Allows for adding the complexity down the road in a compatible way, should >> there be need >> 2) Uniformity; i.e. always using integer values for referring to array >> elements. > > I have to say that this suggestion sounds very compelling to me, for > both reasons. I know there's a bunch of running code out there, but > this (and perhaps teasing apart the "add" and "insert" concepts into > separate verbs) seems worth the bother.
This is true, it does sound compelling. There will, no doubt, be questions about why -2 doesn't work. It's tempting to implement -2 and -3, so you might have to explain why that is a bad idea. index = (index + length) % length
