On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote: > I'll also note that RFC 1123 most certainly does use the term "compliant" in > regards to capitalized terms it defines, and if nitpicking on this point > becames an issue I have zero problem replacing references to RFC 2119 with > references to RFC 1123 in the future.
+1. There is similar language in RFC 1122 and RFC 1812. From the standpoint of making the requirements clear for an implementor, I think that these three specifications were among the best the IETF ever produced. //cmh
