On 3/16/13 4:54 PM, James Galvin wrote: > >
<snip> > > It seems to me that the real question here is what is the role of the > confirming body? Should its role be biased towards a review (however > deep) of the work of the NOMCOM or should its role be biased towards > ensuring the NOMCOM has followed the process in selecting its slate of > candidates? > > Jim Towards the NOMCOM has followed the correct procedure and there were no anomalies. If the confirming body starts rejected candidates because it does not like them or thinks that they do not have the proper qualifications, then we have a problem with our procedures. /as
