It did go to IETF-Announce. It's just no longer in the To: field so
people stop doing a reply-all and end up sending to it. (Basically, it's
Bcc'ed. For e-mail geeks like me: An empty group list of
"IETF-Announce:;" is now in the To: field.)
pr
On 4/22/13 3:39 PM, Clint Chaplin wrote:
Why did this (and the other most recent) last call also not go to
IETF-Announce?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:24 AM, The IESG <nore...@ietf.org
<mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the NETCONF Data Modeling
Language
WG (netmod) to consider the following document:
- 'A YANG Data Model for IP Management'
<draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org> mailing lists by 2013-05-03.
Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to i...@ietf.org <mailto:i...@ietf.org> instead. In either
case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for management of IP
implementations.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
--
Clint (JOATMON) Chaplin
Principal Engineer
Standards & Technology Enabling
Advanced Technology Lab
Samsung R&D Institute America - Silicon Valley
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
