On 4/28/13, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Thank you for your thorough review. While I accept many of your > comments, I must say I disagree with you on a few points, which together > go to the core of our motivation in writing this document. Thank you for > helping me clarify these points to myself :-) > > - Our goal is much *less* ambitious than defining a framework for > documenting implementations for long-term protocol projects. Our primary > goal is to aid working group members in making informed decisions about > the quality of specifications. I believe this narrow focus is much more > realistic.
Was this goal/point mentioned in the I-D if not, it will be nice to clarify this point to future readers, > > - As a result of the above: 1. We define the information as pre-RFC > only; 2. The main medium is the I-D, as opposed to Web pages/wikis/CMS > (although we see them as valid alternatives); 3. We focus on WG > documents, as opposed to "all" IETF documents. If not mentioned in I-D, please clarify this point in the I-D,
