On May 17, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <f...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > On May 16, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Yoav Nir <y...@checkpoint.com> wrote: > >> There is a problem, though, that this will increase the load on ADs. Other >> concerns raised during IETF LC may lead to revised I-Ds, which the ADs will >> need to re-read (or at least look at the diff). I don't know how significant >> this extra work would be, but it would come at a time that we're thinking of >> ways to reduce AD workload. It might also require prolonging the LC time, >> because there would be actual discussion in it. > > If they raise the issue later in a "discuss", will they not have to do this > anyway? How does this relate to the timing of the comment or the vehicle by > which it is conveyed? If you review early, you later might feel like you need to review again, because the document has changed some. Hence - more work. Yoav
