--On Saturday, July 20, 2013 19:17 -0700 Tim Bray <tb...@textuality.com> wrote:
> Fair enough. I think it would be reasonable to ask that: > > - the draft include the word "privacy" > - the draft discuss the issues around relying on an identifier > that persists across changes in device ownership > > There may be an issue concerning a SIP-related identifier > which is unavailable on millions of mobile devices which do > not have IMEIs, but it's quite possible that it's > non-applicable in the context of the draft. -T Personally, I'd consider getting all three of those issues addressed in the document (including a discussion of the applicability of the latter and a serious discussion of the privacy issues) as adding value... and as requirements for RFC publication in the IETF Stream. john
