Hi, I don't care if this report is published or not, but I will point out that the 1 week sample period is not that useful if the intent is to spot excessive posting.
Somebody could be following up on 1 thread, and not post again for a year. Somebody could be participating in an IETF Last Call discussion, which should not even count as "extra" since that is a critical part of our review process. Andy On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Heasley <h...@shrubbery.net> wrote: > Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambar...@gmail.com>: > >> On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström <p...@frobbit.se> wrote: >>> On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambar...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 >>>> in each week). >> >>>> However, in my comment below I >>>> will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday >>>> (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights). >>> >>> The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs >>> between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have >>> Monday as the first day of the week. >> >> I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday (read what i > > I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality, > one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is > only a guage of the distraction they produce. The report itself is a > distraction.
