On Aug 10, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote: > Section 1.1 goes on at some length about the intended use for the document > is. If you believe it is unclear or incomplete, some pointed questions > about it would be entirely appropriate.
To expand on this slightly, the point is that if you say "it's not clear to me what the use case for this document is," that's a valid objection, and the authors ought to address it, either by explaining to the satisfaction of the consensus-caller and, more generally, the reviewers, why it's not relevant, or by fixing the document to be clearer about what the current intended use cases are. But if you want that to happen, you should really raise your objection in a way that makes it clearly actionable, so that the authors know you are asking them to do something.
