I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2013-8-28 IETF LC End Date: 2013-9-4 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: I am not clear on the sub-TLV in section 6.2 1. If a new sub-TLV is defined for TLV type 1 do they need also to be added to TLV type 21. This should be clear, and if there is some relation I think it should be reflected in the IANA registry for TLV type 1 2. For the vendor or private use why a difference policy than the rest of the sub-TLV registry Nits/editorial comments: 1. In section 3.4 I assume that "TC" is traffic class. It will be good to expand and have reference.