On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM, SM <s...@resistor.net> wrote:

> Hi Murray,
>
> At 01:14 21-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
>> Ah.  I realize that CRLF is standard line termination for SMTP; is it
>> automatically the expected line termination for all line-oriented
>> protocols?  I don't know about others.
>>
>
> I would have to write a long answer to that question. :-)  I haven't had
> time to test what the draft specifies.  Thanks for addressing the comments.
>
>
>
We can go with CRLF, since it's been pointed out to me that most text-based
protocols have historically used that.  Who am I to change history?  :-)

-MSK

Reply via email to