On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM, SM <s...@resistor.net> wrote: > Hi Murray, > > At 01:14 21-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >> Ah. I realize that CRLF is standard line termination for SMTP; is it >> automatically the expected line termination for all line-oriented >> protocols? I don't know about others. >> > > I would have to write a long answer to that question. :-) I haven't had > time to test what the draft specifies. Thanks for addressing the comments. > > > We can go with CRLF, since it's been pointed out to me that most text-based protocols have historically used that. Who am I to change history? :-)
-MSK