On 07/09/2013 08:55, Tim Chown wrote:
> On 6 Sep 2013, at 21:32, Roger Jørgensen <rog...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Adam Novak <interf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> The IETF focused on developing protocols (and reserving the necessary
>>> network numbers) to facilitate direct network peering between private
>>> individuals, it could make it much more expensive to mount large-scale
>>> traffic interception attacks.
>> Think there are work being done on the topic? However, how are you
>> going to interconnect all of this private peerings? It sort of imply
>> that everyone need to have their own netblock they can exchange with
>> others.
>
> Mobile IPv6 gives one way to run multiple devices in one subnet. Someone
> needs to be the HA though. And/or if future homes have multiple /64's, it's
> not infeasible to dedicate one or more to virtual/overlay LANs.
It serves no purpose as long as there's an underlying customer/provider
relationship, because it's the provider that is suborned by the government
agency.
Brian
