On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Noel Chiappa <j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote: > > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_J=F8rgensen?= <rog...@gmail.com> > > > The userbase and deployment are relative small atm so it's doable to > > get fast deployment to. > > Alas, now that I think about the practicalities.... I don't think the average > router has enough spare computing power to completely encrypt all the traffic.
I don't really see that as an issue, it's just a matter of engineering and building the router in a way that they can do it. AFAIK I think most routers have the options of being extended by dedicated encrypt-all-traffic tasks? Probably some changes needed on the software layer to use the extension but that's doable. It is also just the situation right now on the router side. In general should our current technology and processing power be up for the job if needed. > Whether or not encrypting just the source+dest addresses, and the sort+dest > port (conviently next to each other in one block) is enough to do much good, > and if the average router has enough spare crunch to do even that, is a good > question. Isn't the payload the important part to protect? the content of the package? -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rog...@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | ro...@jorgensen.no
