I am part of the community design team as well because I participate with community more than the private hidden groups. I think that the draft is a true work open to IETF. I still did not get a reply to my request to know what is the DT authority, very strange name without any procedure in IETF, please explain,
AB On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Eggert, Lars <l...@netapp.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm part of the design team. SM has written this document to begin a > discussion with the broader IETF. > > The document does not have the consensus of the design team, and it is > therefore obviously not a recommendation by the design team. > > Lars > > On Oct 10, 2013, at 20:10, S Moonesamy <sm+i...@elandsys.com> wrote: > > Hi Jari, > > > > Here's is a draft about improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to > attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF. The draft > builds upon the ISOC work, proposing adjustments and additional efforts, > with the goal of enabling more sustained and active participation by > contributors from under-represented regions. > > > > In a blog article ( http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/04/diversity/ ), it > is mentioned that: > > > > "The design team will present their recommendations to the community, > > and engage in the discussion. Recommendations with community support > > will be taken forward." > > > > The draft only makes suggestions instead of recommendations. I am > copying this message to ietf@ietf.org so that the community can comment > about the draft. > > > > Regards, > > S. Moonesamy<draft-ddt-fellowship-03.txt> > >
