On Oct 11, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Scott O Bradner <s...@sobco.com> wrote: > The process in the ID is not what was followed when I was an AD and it not > what I have described by the meaning of the term "rough consensus" in my > newcomers tutorials (which I have been giving since at least IETF 57 in > 2003).
Perhaps I should be embarrassed to ask this question, but how _do_ you describe the meaning of the term "rough consensus?"
