Is there ever a case where a merged reference channel is useful? I thought the only possible use for a reference channel was for comparing individual scans. That is, prior to merging.
--Matt On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Zajac, Dariusz A. <dariusz.za...@desy.de> wrote: > Dear Bruce, Dear All, > maybe it is a naïve question but I want to ask and to point this problem... > > Windows XP. Athena 0.8.059 > Sc.Linux. Athena 0.8.060 > > I have a set of data with refernces (one sample, many scans). I have marked > sample's groups and do "merge marked data in mu(E)" then I get merged data > together with reference (2 groups: merge - sample, and Ref merge - reference). > But... > ...if I have marked reference sample's groups and do "merge" then I get 2 > groups: merge - which is merged data of reference, and Ref merge - which is > marged data of sample. Oposite to that I did in first example! > > Is any hidden idea, I can not see, why it should be that way? If you don't > know about that, can confuse and surprise... > cheers > darek > _______________________________________________ > Ifeffit mailing list > Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit > > _______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
