Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Multiple scattering paths in fitting (Frenkel, Anatoly)
2. Re: schemes for delr and sigma2 for multiple scattering
paths
(Scott Calvin)
---
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:38:26 -0400
From: "Frenkel, Anatoly"<[email protected]>
To: "XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit"<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Multiple scattering paths in fitting
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
For relationships between sigma2 for MS and SS paths, some are
listed in the Appendix to this article:
P. Shanthakumar, et al, Physical Review B 74, 174103 (2006).
Anatoly
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3479 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:<http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20101007/35cd3550/attachment-0001.bin
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 06:58:04 -0700
From: Scott Calvin<[email protected]>
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] schemes for delr and sigma2 for multiple
scattering paths
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Jatin,
IF the uniform expansion model is valid for single scattering paths,
then it is for multiple scattering paths as well. For some materials,
particularly those with cubic space groups, that's got a good chance
of being a useful model. Others tends to distort with changes in
temperature, doping, etc., and it may not work as well. But even in
those cases, if you've decided how to constrain the delr for single-
scattering paths, you'll do reasonably well by using some kind of
appropriate average of the delr's for related single-scattering
paths.
--Scott Calvin
Sarah Lawrence College
On Oct 7, 2010, at 3:05 AM, Jatinkumar Rana wrote:
Dear all,
It is reasonable to assign a constant fraction by which unit cell
expands at a given temperature of XAFS measuremnt and so the
variation
in the path lengths for every single scattering paths could be
assigned
as delr = alpha * Reff. Similarly, one can assign sigma2 value for
each
single scattering path depending on both type of scatterer and its
distance from the absorbing atom.
Now coming to multiple scattering paths, Sigma2 for multiple
scattering
paths can be constrained based on the sigma2 of related single
scattering paths and a definite path-geometry-dependent scheme
(Triangle, collinear, reversed etc.) could be applied.
Is there any such scheme for delr of multiple scattering paths ?
or we
can simply assume that all paths (single scattering and multiple
scattering) undergo uniform expansion by a factor alpha.
Thank you so much in advance for your valuable time...
With best regards,
Jatin Rana
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
[email protected]
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
[email protected]
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
End of Ifeffit Digest, Vol 92, Issue 6
**************************************