Seems to me that in this era of nigh-infinite disk space, there's no need for
binaries for EXAFS files like this. The ASCII is perfectly fine.
One question to ask: Is the offset already subtracted from the data count? I
assume that it is, because the last column has numbers that are smaller
than the offset numbers.
Another question is which energy to believe. On 10.3.2, it turns out that the
requested energy seems to be more accurate than the reported energy. This
becomes clear when you look at XANES and find it much smoother, especially in
the derivative, when you use the requested energy.
mam
On 2/1/2015 12:10 PM, Khalid, Syed wrote:
How to handle SSRL, beamline 2-2 data.
Attached is a binary and an ASCII file(with under score A).
Wordpad reads it, first column is time (data point duration), second energy it
must go to, third real energy where mono went, fourth I0 and fifth It. It is
gold foil transmission data.
Syed Khalid
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
