If you go beyond first shell, then you'll need to take into account the
Se-Se paths in Li2Se. That may be your best way of detecting Li2Se.
mam
On 5/27/2021 12:03 PM, Carlo Segre wrote:
Hi Deltsidis:
Using Artemis, you can compare the calculated Fourier Transforms of the
Se-Fe and Se-Li paths to see if the latter will actually be visible. I
suspect that it will not if it is an impurity phase with small phase
fraction. I would probably start with only Se-Fe and see how well it
can fit the data.
The eins(T, thetae) is the temperature dependent term. What is missing
the static disorder that needs to be added into the sigma^2 to account
for the temperature independent residual disorder.
Carlo
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:43 AM Alexandros Deltsidis
<adeltsi...@iesl.forth.gr <mailto:adeltsi...@iesl.forth.gr>> wrote:
Dear mailing list,
I am currently analyzing some EXAFS data. I am studying a Lix(C5H5N)FeSe
system in a temperature grid that extends from 20 K to 300 K and I
have 4
such datasets which correspond to different amount of doping (x). Right
now, im focusing on fitting the 1st coordination cell, in Artemis
for the
Se K-edge. My starting model is the simple P4/nmm FeSe. So, in my system
the 1st coordination cell, in the Se K-edge, corresponds to the Se
(absorber) - Fe (backscatterer) pair. I have 2 questions:
1) I realize now, that I have a certain impurity in the high doping
range
on my system, namely Li2Se. I try to include a scattering path from the
respective Li2Se crystal model in my fits, since a Se (absorber) - Li
(backscatterer) pair is present in the R-range of my fit in the Forward
Fourier Transform. My question here is if this makes sense since Li is
much smaller scatterer compared to Se. In other words, does it make
sense
to look for physical parameters (Li-Se bond length and DW factor
respectively) of a signal (Se-Li) that is "tucked" in below the main
peak
coming from the "majority" Se-Fe signal in the FFT?
2)Also, I'm attempting to extract an Einstein temperature for each of
those datasets, by utilizing the "eins(T, thetae)" function
implemented in
Artemis. What is the equation that is parametrized here? Does it include
the s0^2 offset term that accounts for the overall configuration
disorder
in the system? And if that is the case is there same way to separate it
from the temperature dependent s^2 term?
Thank you in advance,
Deltsidis Alexandros
PS:I am attaching a png. file exported from Artemis that is relative
to my
question 1)
Ph.D candidate,
Institute of Electronic Structure and Laser (IESL),
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas
(FORTH)_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
<mailto:Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
<http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit>
Unsubscribe:
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
<http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit>
--
Carlo U. Segre -- Duchossois Leadership Professor of Physics
Professor of Materials Science & Engineering
Director, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation
Illinois Institute of Technology
Voice: 312.567.3498 Fax: 312.567.3494
se...@iit.edu <mailto:se...@iit.edu> http://phys.iit.edu/~segre
<http://phys.iit.edu/~segre> se...@debian.org <mailto:se...@debian.org>
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
