Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the response. I am confusing about the two plots. Could you
please explain more about the difference?

[image: image.png]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231097049_Cs_L-edge_EXAFS_atomic_absorption_background/figures?lo=1



[image: image.png]


Kind regards,


N. C. Tien




Mangold, Stefan (IPS) <stefan.mang...@kit.edu> 於 2021年7月1日 週四 下午3:38寫道:

> normal for every element,
>
> the higher the energy, the larger is the penetration depth —
>
> regards
>
> Stefan Mangold
>
> Am 01.07.2021 um 06:13 schrieb 田能全 <tien.nengch...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> Hi everyone,
> My colleague sent me data of liquid CsNO3 sample measured using
> fluorescence model. According to the attached figure, I don't understand
> why mu(E) increased with increasing energy before and after the L3 edge.
> Does it make sense for cesium?  Thanks.
>
> Nengchuan
> <image.png>
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
> Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
> Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
>
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit

Reply via email to