Hi Umberto,

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Umberto77 <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]

>  The problem is that using graph.neighborhood I get an output like this:
>

> [[65]]
> IGRAPH DN-- 6 15 --
> + attr: name (v/c), value (e/n)
>
> [[66]]
> IGRAPH DN-- 3 2 --
> + attr: name (v/c), value (e/n)
>

What kind of output would you like?


> where egos in my list are identified by a number in squared brackets.
> Since I need to work on a time series, I need to keep trace of the name of
> the egos, so that to build an egonetwork density time series for each of my
> nodes across 10 years.
>

If you want a named list as the output, just add the vertex of the original
graph to the result list:
names(result) <- V(originalgraph)$name


> As for "graph.density" it calculates density as ratio between number of
> ties and all the possible ties in the (ego)network, while I need to
> calculate it as number of ties over number of pairs. I was wondering if
> there's a direct function to perform it in place of "graph.density".
>

What exactly is the difference? Isn't "all possible ties" the same as the
number of pairs (ordered or unordered, depending on whether your graph is
directed)?

[...]

> What if I create a list of networks, including all my 10 years, and than
> use "lapply" for "graph.neighborhood" and than for "graph.density"?
>

I am not sure what is the question here. If you would like to do this, just
go ahead. :)

Best,
Gabor

[...]
_______________________________________________
igraph-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help

Reply via email to