Hi,

thank you for your answer, I didn't write the whole matrix in the table
just for semplication, but it is a square matrix. So everything should be
fine right?

thank you!


2013/5/3 Tamás Nepusz <[email protected]>

> Hi,
>
> > Import the txt file which looks as following (The first row specifies
> the code for the different nodes, the other rows specifies the weights of
> edges).
> How come that your input file is not a square matrix? It seems to have 8
> rows and 13 columns -- where are the 5 missing rows and the 5 missing node
> names?
>
> Otherwise what you do seems okay for me.
>
> > IS it ok for igraph to have the name of the nodes just in the first row
> and not in the first column to generate an adjacency matrix? i have read
> somewhere it is the same as having the first column with 'A','B','C',etc
> igraph doesn't care -- it does not read your file, it reads the matrix
> that you loaded with read.table. If the matrix looks fine in R, then it
> should be okay for igraph as well.
>
> > I want then to calculate the betweenness, that will return a result for
> each node, but I am not sure whether the weights are inserted correctly in
> the function.
> Seems okay for me, assuming that your input matrix is correct -- which is
> still a bit weird for me because of the missing rows.
>
> > Is there a way I can check the results using other programs?
> Of course -- find another program that can calculate weighted betweenness
> scores and compare the results ;) One possible option is the NetworkX
> module for Python if you know the Python language. (igraph also has a
> Python interface but it would be quite useless to compare igraph in Python
> vs igraph in R because they use the same implementation).
>
> --
> T.
> _______________________________________________
> igraph-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
>
_______________________________________________
igraph-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help

Reply via email to