Hi, Laurens,

I have a program made by myself to transform the edgelist file into pajek file.


If the file is large, it buffers data in a MSSQLSERVER database. You need .NET4 
to run it. Do you want it?


Gang


------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Laurens Rietveld"<laurens.rietv...@gmail.com>;
Date:  Fri, May 3, 2013 10:34 PM
To:  "Help for igraph users"<igraph-help@nongnu.org>; 

Subject:  Re: [igraph] Less vertices in output than input



Hi Gabor,

Thanks for replying. I can provide an example, though it is quite big (~3GB): 
http://aers.data2semantics.org/input.tsv
 

I've tried smaller graphs to reproduce this issue with, but couldnt find any. 


I will try to get this into pajek format, though it'll be some work. I'd hope 
to avoid this as much as possible (I have bigger graphs around 130GB as 
well..). 
 

If I understand correctly, the number of isolates might be an issue here? Thing 
is, when I take a look at my graph, I'm sure some of the vertices have incoming 
edges. However, when I calculate the indegree, some of these vertices are still 
missing..
 

Best, Laurens









On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:47 PM, G??bor Cs??rdi <csa...@rmki.kfki.hu> wrote:
   You need to send us a complete example that reproduces a problem. Most 
probably you have isolate vertices, and from an edge list file format it is 
sometimes not possible to know how many isolates you have. Use another file 
format, like Pajek,  that is almost the same as an edge list, but specified the 
number of vertices explicitly. 
 
 Gabor
 
 
 
 On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Laurens Rietveld  <laurens.rietv...@vu.nl> 
wrote:
 

 I'm running igraph to do some experiments, and for some graphs I notice the 
number of vertices in the analysis output table (e.g. the output of evcent 
(graph, directed = FALSE)) is less than the vertices used as input (edge list). 
 Because this only happens for some typical graphs (quite disconnected), I'm 
assuming this occurs because there is no weight assigned to this vertice (i.e. 
value zero). Is this true? Or is something else going wrong here?
 
 
 Many thanks,
 Laurens
 
 
 
 
 


 _______________________________________________
 igraph-help mailing list
 igraph-help@nongnu.org
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
 
  
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Gabor Csardi <csa...@rmki.kfki.hu>     MTA KFKI RMKI
_______________________________________________
igraph-help mailing list
igraph-help@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help

Reply via email to