> > Agreed. This said, adding a small (not epsilon, but rather 0.1 or > something like that) constant to the graph still makes sense, the same > way as it does for PageRank on graphs that are not strongly connected. > But then this would be a parameter, like for PR. > > It is the small epsilon, added only if double eigenvalues are > detected, that I am against. > > Gabor >
Hmm. OK. That is also an option - to always add some constant. This whole thread might be a good topic for Prof Kleinberg to consider. I didn't see anything about this in the original paper - I might have missed something in the proofs.
_______________________________________________ igraph-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
