Hi, On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Dimitris Diochnos <[email protected]>wrote: [...]
> - Re-making the library in one of the versions 0.6.4/5 does allow me > to rerun successfully programs that I had written in the past and had > dependencies on igraph (I believe it was 0.6.3, or something like that > back then). However, after 'make' if one tries 'make check' in both > 0.6.4 and 0.6.5 there are 20 tests where the library fails to pass. > This should not happen, at least surely not for 20 tests. I suspect it is a configuration issue on your part (e.g. warning messages of the compiler make them fail), or you are using an exotic platform. But if you don't tell us which ones fail and how, we cannot help you. Essentially we need the contents of tests/testsuite.dir/*/test* after running the tests. We also need information about your platform. - On the other hand, the 0.7.0 library does pass on the same machine > the 'make check' part (0 failures), but at least one critical program > that I have ends up with runtime execution problems. For the same code > as in 0.6.4/5 I get warnings this time that I am using the > igraph_adjlist_get(&list, node) which now returns igraph_vector_int_t > * and not igraph_vector_t * as it used to return in the past (and in > the documentation online). I thought this was only typecasting but > apparently there has to be a more fundamental change in the code and > the way the adjacency lists are computed and extracted. Moreover, I > also checked the output of the following: > sizeof( igraph_vector_t * ) = 8 > sizeof(const igraph_vector_t * ) = 8 > sizeof( igraph_vector_int_t *) = 8 > sizeof(const igraph_vector_int_t *) = 8 > under 0.6.4/5 and 0.7.0 and in every case I get the answer above, so, > from a first glance this does not seem to be problem of alignment or a > new data type either. Long story sort, do you believe that the > igraph_adjlist_get(...) behaves correctly, or should I try to come up > with a minimal example where the output is not what it is expected? I > am pretty sure the work in 0.7.0 is unfinished though. > igraph 0.7.0 is pretty much finished, but it is not backwards compatible with 0.6.x, unfortunately. Closing, I am also worried that 0.6.5 does not pass through 'make > check' some tests on cliques. I am not focusing on cliques right now, > but I would like to make sure that problems like this one from the > past (https://github.com/igraph/igraph/issues/123) has been resolved, > even though the library fails to pass 2 of the 3 make check tests for > cliques. So, is the most stable library currently online 0.6.5? > Issue 123 was fixed according to the linked page, but you can try it yourself, the bug report has a data set for which igraph failed back then. As for the failing test cases, again, if you don't show us what happens, what can we do? Gabor [...]
_______________________________________________ igraph-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
