On Mar 29, 12:02 pm, Abdulaziz Ghuloum <[email protected]> wrote: > It's the simplicity of the > evaluation model that would be affected if the compiler > becomes too smart (i.e., too smart for its own good). > You don't want a compiler that's too smart for this. > You probably want a compiler that has consistent and > predictable behavior when presented with "incorrect" > programs (after you define the meaning of "incorrect" > programs :-)).
You have a point here. I will have to sleep on this.
