On May 6, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Derick Eddington wrote:
I was talking about Ikarus. Before I posted last time, I did know Ypsilon does what you say. I say Ypsilon is doing implicit phasing wrong.
Or maybe just applying the label incorrectly for different semantics. Maybe Fujita took "implicit phasing" to mean: the "for" syntax is ignored and identifiers are the same at all levels. This partially (but not full) characterizes implicit phasing. But since I have not trademarked the term, I can't sue him for using it. :-) Aziz,,,
