Are the xitomatl libraries / tools documented?
Do you know if there are many users?

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Derick Eddington
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 18:07 +1000, Ramana Kumar wrote:
>> This is a version I found by searching my emails... I haven't used it
>> in a while, but I think this might be the latest.
>>
>>  (define-syntax compose
>>    (syntax-rules ()
>>      ((_) (lambda a (apply values a)))
>>      ((_ p p* ...) (lambda a (call-with-values (lambda () (apply p a))
>> (compose p* ...))))))
>>
>> The multiple values stuff (whose syntax takes up the bulk of the code)
>> isn't crucial - just for generality.
>
> I love multiple return values.  Especially proper zero return values as
> Ikarus, Chez, and PLT (and probably others) do, which nothing else
> (lists, records, etc.) can emulate (I believe).
>
>> In this case your version might be better because you only create two 
>> closures.
>
> And my compose is a first-class procedure.  (I've also just changed it
> to do the (reverse procs) only once.)
>
> --
> : Derick
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

Reply via email to