On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 17:55 -0700, Derick Eddington wrote: > On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 17:46 -0700, Derick Eddington wrote: > > This should be a new thread. (Sorry Eduardo, CC'ing you might be part > > of the bug, so I wanted to test.) > > OK. I don't know what's going on, but that second post about "library > naming under unique namespaces" was certainly a new not-reply message. > I don't know if it's my mail client (Evolution, I hate it, need to > change) or Google Groups being confused about the threads or what.
I think I figured out what happened. My first post was indeed accidentally a reply to the wrong existing thread [ In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> ] And there after, Google Groups put all my subsequent non-reply posts in that thread just because the Subject: was the same. Don't I feel smart. Be careful of trying to think while frustrated. -- : Derick ----------------------------------------------------------------
