On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum<[email protected]> wrote: > I always knew this, but today, I became totally convinced how bad an effect > this procedure name has on people.
It is bad. > Whoever came up with this name should be punished by typing it 1000 times. lol wat hahaha > It's so much easier to write (error 'foo > ---) even when it's not the correct procedure to use. Such a stupid name > for such a common use. What is a better name? I'd vote for 'breach' because it is a violation of the contract, but perhaps that sounds too business like. It is short, though.
