On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 20:07 -0700, Derick Eddington wrote: > > [...] > R6RS's versioning-in-library-names is complicated to the point of being > flawed [1], unfortunately. I really wish versioning could be reasonably > done with library names and imports, but the complication/flaw is > intrinsic. So, if we're going to have versioning which supports version > constraints and multiple available versions
By "available" I meant installed. Supporting having multiple versions of a library installed is necessary so different programs/libraries which need different versions of a library can all be used. -- : Derick ----------------------------------------------------------------
