On Sep 2, 2009, at 8:24 PM, kub wrote:
I have following problem which looks like a bug: syntax-violation thrown from eval has invalid syntax inside (contains symbol).
If you look at the condition thrown, it'd look something like
#[compound-condition
(#[&who guard]
#[&message "invalid syntax"]
#[&syntax (guard) #f]
#[&source-position "./t.sls" 43]
#[&trace #<syntax (guard) [char 43 of ./t.sls]>])]
which looks perfectly valid.
What do you think it *should* look like?
Aziz,,,
