On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 19:54 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote: > Note that this is more powerful than readtables where all extensions > must be prefixed with the # character (which Aziz hates). With the > above idea, any non-standard lexical syntax could be used (I think), > because read can be parsing something which so far looks standard but > then encounters a non-standard character and delegates to the handler, > giving it the string (whose last character is the non-standard one) and > port. I.e., things like +1 could be read as the symbol equal to > (string->symbol "+1")
Damnit, I meant things like 1+ could be read as the symbol equal to (string->symbol "1+"). -- : Derick ----------------------------------------------------------------
