On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 13:36 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote: > Yeah, I know about that. It's Ypsilon's bug, related to: > http://code.google.com/p/ypsilon/issues/detail?id=128
Is the plan to wait for Ypsilon to be fixed or to workaround the issue temporarily? Ypsilon ships with it's own SRFI-1 so I was surprised to see that it was picking up the SRFI from via sitelib variable; I figured Ypsilon would prefer it's own libraries. Alot of my code depends upon the your SRFIs so if the plan is to wait for Ypsilon to be fixed, then I'll probably adjust the directions to specify that revision 91 be used. Ed
