On Aug 29, 2008, at 12:40 PM, James Mansion wrote:
> Terence Parr wrote: >> This one is much more efficient but I am not sure it will show up >> unless you have a huge input. >> > Isn't the optimisation of: > > <some-elided-constructs> foo <some-more-elided-constructs> -> foo > > to > > foo > > something that antlr could do fairly easily? nope... how can I be sure you do not want those elided constructs? foo -> foo I suppose I could get rid of, but two compilers really get rid of a=a;? Ter List: http://www.antlr.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org:8080/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
