At 07:32 20/09/2008, jack zhang wrote:
>Thanks. Now the warnings are cleared.  The only issue I had is 
>that for the following invalid inputs, it won't report error. 
>Here is the grammar.
>1) AND
>2) OR
>3) AND a
>4) OR a
[...]
>expr: orexpression*;

Your top level rule does not require anything at all to be matched 
("*" is zero-or-more, and if the input isn't a valid orexpression 
then it'll simply match nothing at all and succeed).

If you want to require at least one orexpression to be present, 
change the * to a +.  If you want to additionally ensure that the 
entire input is consumed (or produce an error if not), add EOF to 
the end of the rule.  For example:

expr : orexpression+ EOF;



List: http://www.antlr.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.antlr.org:8080/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to