At 02:07 PM 9/12/2009, Terence Parr wrote: >On Sep 12, 2009, at 12:06 AM, Gerald Rosenberg wrote: >>Given an existing AST with the two paths: > >i'd recommend doing ^(m .*) match and a pred in front that says >hasAncestor(a) or something >Ter
OK, I completely missed BaseTree#hasAncestor Regards the "or something," TreeParser#inContext would seem to be it. However, that method seems to have gone missing from 3.1.3 (it was in 3.1.2, but is still absent in 3.1.4). Is there a reason that method got pulled? Thanks. List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
