Sangeeta Misra writes: > > >> SMF does not provide any means to display the > >> statistics of a service. > >> > > > > Statistics aren't configuration; they're a very different kind of > > data. No, SMF doesn't expose statistics. > > > > What I am stating is that a admin would have to learn about SMF tool and > ilbadm tool to use ILB feature.
And what I am stating is that this is incorrect. > What I would like to see is one tool > that controls everything of ILB feature( and yes I understand that we > have a difference in philosophy here.) I don't think we're even agreeing on what the difference is. I'm talking about configuration parameter storage, *NOT* administrative interfaces. You're talking about administrative interfaces, and you're assuming that I'm suggesting changes to your plan that I've already specifically said that I'm *NOT* suggesting at all. Using libscf does *NOT* mean that users must use svccfg. > > I believe that this is not an accurate representation of how SMF is > > supposed to be factored into new system features. If I were working > > on this project, I'd certainly want to validate those sorts of > > assumptions with them. > > > > By them do you mean customers? No. I mean the SMF Enhanced Profiles and other SMF experts. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
