On 01/28/09 11:21, Gary Winiger wrote: >> o where would you recommend that the persistent config files belong. >> Would having them in /etc/ilbadm directory still be appropriate.? > > Ideally it would not exist and be a [set of] smf properties. > Since I believe we've already been down that path and the file > is too complex for properties, what's wrong with the use of > /etc/ilbadm/*?
nothing per se. > Is the issue that ilbd can't hold the files open > and needs create access in that directory so it can do atomic > renames? we haven't explored this yet in detail; since ilbd is the only producer and consumer of this file, I don't see any reason not to keep the file open. thx Michael -- Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
