Michael Schuster wrote:
> I guess it would, but that's not what I expected after that email
> exchange I mentioned.
> Conversely, is "port == 0 means 'all ports'" hard to implement?
It is just code after all. So the sanity check becomes
more involved...
if ((min_port == 0 && max_port != 0) ||
(min_port != 0 && max_port == 0) ||
(min_port > max_port) {
return (EINVAL);
}
if (min_port == 0) {
min_port = 1;
max_port = 65535;
}
If you think that the above is easier to read than the
current simple check, feel free to change the code.
--
K. Poon.
kacheong.poon at sun.com
