This came from the Conrail Technical Society List. You would think that
ACME/Interlake was the
largest steelmaker on the face of the earth, considering all of the postings it
has generated lately.

Jim Torgeson
---------------------- Forwarded by James S. Torgeson on 11/24/99 11:55 PM
---------------------------
From: John Krattinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/25/99 04:58 AM GMT



Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



To:   AAA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:    (bcc: James S. Torgeson)
Subject:  CRTS Update #11-98



CRTS Update #11-98
Wednesday, November 24th, 1999 at 20:05 EST

Surface Transportation Board (Board) Chairman Linda J. Morgan announced
today that the Board has issued a decision finding no basis for granting
the request of Acme Steel Company (Acme) for an emergency service order
under 49 U.S.C. 11123.  Acme had asked for a declaration of an emergency
and an order directing the Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NS), CSX
Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), and the Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
Company
(IHB) to cooperate with each other and to coordinate in providing rail
transportation to Acme's facilities in the Chicago, Illinois, area.

Acme stated that it filed the petition for emergency service relief to
address service problems that have arisen during the transitional period
since the operations of the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) were
taken over by CSXT and NS on June 1, 1999.  Indicating that its rail
service has deteriorated, Acme asked the Board to issue an emergency
service order directing the three carriers to cooperate so that service
to
Acme will be provided no less quickly than it was historically provided
by
Conrail.

The Board denied the petition, concluding that the relief sought was
inappropriate and unnecessary.  While recognizing that shippers have
faced
service issues since the transfer of Conrail's operations to CSXT and
NS,
the Board found--and Acme conceded--that the current situation is not
similar to that which compelled the Board in 1997 to declare an
emergency
in the West.  The Board also noted that Acme has never asked the Board
to
work with the carriers on Acme's behalf, and in fact, in its formal
petition for emergency relief, Acme did not ask the Board to take any
specific action to address specific operational problems, or to provide
the
type of relief (related to the routing or movement of traffic)
identified
in the emergency service provisions of the law.  And the Board saw no
need
to grant the relief that Acme did seek--an order "direct[ing] NS, CSXT
and
IHB . . . to immediately begin cooperating in coordinating their
facilities
to allow the prompt movement of hot metal"--because it was clear from
the
record, including Acme's own submission, that the carriers are already
cooperating and coordinating their operations to provide improved
service
to Acme and to other shippers.

The Board noted that it continues to actively monitor the operational
aspects of the Conrail transaction through CSXT's and NS's regular
service
data reporting, and through daily contacts with railroads, shippers, and
railroad employees, and has developed an informal process to address
specific service complaints.  The Board's Office of Compliance and
Enforcement (OCE) has established an open line of communication with
senior
railroad officials, and OCE immediately forwards service complaints
brought
to it informally by shippers seeking assistance.  OCE follows up on each
complaint to ensure that it is being addressed appropriately.  In some
cases, OCE staff may review the steps that the carrier is taking, and
may
recommend alternatives.  Handling shippers' individual service issues
informally in this manner, the Board pointed out, provides an effective
way
for the Board to facilitate real solutions to shippers' service concerns
without overreaching governmental action.  Declaring an emergency simply
so
that it could issue an order on Acme's behalf directing the carriers to
do
what they are already doing, however, would be inappropriate.



 ------------------------------------------------------
 This is the Illiana Railroad Discussion List.
 For more info visit http://www.railcenter.com/illiana
 ------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to