Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > I am a little confused here. Who is 'we'? And why would any sane person > strive > to achieve 'feature parity' with doze? And what is GNU theory? AFAIK hurd is > still not usable. I personally found linux far easier to use than doze back > in > 1995 - and as for 'feature parity' I was under the impression that doze is > striving for that vis-a-vis linux. In fact, the other day I heard someone say > that the latest IE is almost as good as firefox!
'We' as in Linux users. Isn't missing applications one of the excuses to use Windows ? My point was - that is no longer true since Linux has pretty much a complete application stack. I don't think we are even arguing here. You do acknowledge that Linux is far superior to 'doze', but as for HURD, imo, that's a lost cause. :) Sujith -- http://sujith-m.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email ilugc-requ...@ae.iitm.ac.in with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
