On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Prem Kurian Philip <p...@songbirdtech.com>wrote:
> From: Srinivasan Sundararajan <srini...@gmail.com> > > >I understand that the shift to plone (from mambo) was because of the > better > >(portal)user - friendly features. > > My experience with Drupal, Joomla and Plone: > > Both Joomla and Drupal have vibrant user communities and lot of resources > on the web. Both are easy to learn and use. > > Many shared hosting services provide security updates to Drupal and Joomla > installations on their servers as and added service at no cost. > > Plone - ..... will require a VPS or a dedicated server. It requires quite > a bit of memory to run properly. .... Very powerful. Very flexible. Not easy > to learn and ... configure. ..... Also, you won't find as many developers > comfortable with Plone. > > thanks for sharing your thoughts. may i infer that it is easier for the user(developer) to set up a drupal / joomla based CMS -- thus a typical FOSS community contributor group can use this platform. Plone possibly needs a "resource-rich" service provider. Any significant feature variation as regards to the average user (who may have very little FOSS exposure) who wants to access the system, use and contribute to the contents ? srinivasan. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email ilugc-requ...@ae.iitm.ac.in with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
