Smart conclusion... :)
Regards,
Manoj
On 15 February 2011 19:35, Yuva raj <uvar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Just curious about the differences between RHEL, fedora and centos both (
> > centos,fedora) of which are funded by red hat .
> >
> > RHEL is good on Enterprise side , fedora is more on desktop side and
> > centos on enterprise side .
> >
> > Is centos is actively developed and maintained as i see more activity
> on
> > fedora side
> >
> yes
>
> >
> > Could you please let me know what are the major differences bewteen these
> 3
> > os in terms of features , support model , community and industry
> acceptance
> > .
> >
> >
> RHEL Supported by redhat not always a bleeding edge one . RHEL derived
> from
> fedora . For eg: RHEL 6 is derived from fedora 14 .
> People cannot contribute to RHEL i think.
>
> Fedora Always bleeding edge one since release cycle duration is 6 months .
> Most of the open source contribution is done in fedora.
> *
> Centos*
> ALL RHEL source codes are freely available to download in redhat
> website . So some people out there download those code and built it by
> removing all the redhat logos and changing the background color from red to
> blue ;) and yeah renamed it to CentOS . CentOS is backed by most of the
> linux web hosting companies.
>
> Redhat wont support Centos but you can easily migrate from CentOS to RHEL
> and get support from redhat.
> RHEL and Centos is binary compatible.
>
> For Production Environment
> If(have money){
> RHEL
> }
> else
> {
> Centos
> }
>
> All the 3 distros are rpm based one.
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ILUGC Mailing List:
> > http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Thank You
> Best Regards*
>
> *Yuvaraj L*
> _______________________________________________
> ILUGC Mailing List:
> http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
>
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
