On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 07:05:37AM +0530, kenneth gonsalves wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 17:46 +0530, Nitesh Mistry wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 02:32:25PM +0530, kenneth gonsalves wrote: > > > <snip> In this case, stating > > > that Ubuntu gives a 'Human' experience implies that other distros > > give > > > an animal experience. It is ok if the Canonical gang does this - we > > are > > > used to it and can ignore it. It is not good if we repeat it, > > especially > > > when there are many Fedora and debian developers who are valuable > > > members of this list. > > > > No, it does not imply so... it does not say it is the only distro > > that > > gives 'Human' experience. If someone introduces Fedora as free, fast > > and > > stable, does that imply others are non-free, slow or unstable? > > I suggest you study the history of Ubuntu propaganda - there is a long > thread on this in this list (search for 'african spaceman'). It is > unfortunate but true that Ubuntu does not follow the norms for healthy > competition between distros that are followed by *all* the other > distros.
Why the diversion of topic to some past discussion. The point was whether there was something wrong in the original post. Try to argue on the basis of the merits of the current topic of why should one feel bad if someone describes Ubuntu as providing 'Human' experience. -- Regards, Nitesh Mistry | www.mistrynitesh.com PGP key id: A6FEF696 | 'geekosopher' on freenode irc _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
