On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:43 +0530, Sundaram KR wrote: > lawgon said: "I would say that the post under consideration falls > fairly under points > 2 and 6 above and is not OT." > > Objection sustained.
does this mean it is OT or it is not? -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
