On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Natarajan V <raja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 10, 2013 11:50 AM, "Arun Khan" <knu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Natarajan V <raja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > As I was telling Karthick during my session, you can never assume that >> > your code is secure just because you are using some framework. You >> > should always do your home work, and whatever measures that the >> > framework takes, can be broken by a very very stupid programmer :D >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> >> I did cursorily look at the referred links and did not come across any >> mention about the flaw being attributed to "stupid programming" >> >> If a bug is a way to judge our programming abilities, then all of us >> are "very very stupid programmers" > > Context: during my session on security, some one told me that since RoR > takes care of security, they care the least about it and code at will. My > point is you will make a mistake if you really don't worry about security. > Sorry for the miscommunication. >
Thanks for the clarification. I understand your view point and agree with it. -- Arun Khan _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
