On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Please note that SELINUX is a very powerful subsystem and has several
> associated/related commands as a family.
>
> Kindly treat them as a group.
>

+1  It is powerful but also complex.

> I must note here that many admins disable that (the equivalent of
> disabling firewall) rather than keeping them as permissive or Best yet
> "enforcing". I cannot attribute it to anything else other than
> laziness/incompetence.

I would add lack of time.  One would have to read the docs, understand
the MAC concept.  Experiment the custom setup on a non production box
before migrating it to production.

It may come easy to some but I am guessing most people get daunted by
the entire thingy.

I recall, that a default install of apache on CentOS would not work
with SELinux set to enforce. One had to set it to "permissive."
This might have been fixed in the latest incarnates.

> Beyong India, such admins will face severe
> retribution. Sometimes even loss of job.

Do you have any data to back this up?

To the best of my knowledge SELinux is installed and ON (default IIRC)
 only in Redhat and derivative distros.

On other distros (e.g. Debian, Ubuntu, openSUSE) it is available but
*not* installed by default.  openSUSE / Ubuntu defaults to App Armor
(IIRC).

> Hence request you to publish each command in a series as that can be accessed

SELinux is non trivial.  If you have domain knowledge (beyond n00b+)
in the area, please help Dhana Sekar.   Additionally, please blog it
with use case scenarios.

-- 
Arun Khan
Sent from my non-iphone/non-android device
(অরুণ খান্/अरुण खान)
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
ILUGC Mailing List Guidelines:
http://ilugc.in/mailinglist-guidelines

Reply via email to