LinuxLingam wrote: > so what's the final verdict? is that report a fraud or is there some > things about RFID that we do not know yet?
I cannot rule out the latter, there are lots of things about RFID that _I_ do not know yet. But the article's language is inflamatory, not reportive. Coupled with the large use of "may be", "mights", and "could be used", the site is looking for conspiracies. Example, their headline on the front page: "Three Bush protesters taken away by police". Taken away in the middle of the night? Arrested without warrant? Is there a cover-up? Did the President order the abduction? Were there bodies ever found? Now read the article. Or, see "Socialists Fail at Censoring Alex Jones". How were they "censoring[1] him? Who are the "socialists"? Wait, Alex Jones is the webmaster! Read the article, and tell me where you have any mention of the censoring that was been done on him. Considering that he made a PowerPoint presentation at the end, I assume the organisers lent him a screen/projector while they were "censoring" him. "Jones, in one of his trademark tirades against the dark, Satanist-controlled one-world government, told the crowd they had the power to defeat the globalists and the "phony left" socialists at their own game. And they did just that." How? What did they "just do"? Nopes, when in doubt, go to snopes![2] [1] To censor means to suppres _before_ publication. Suppression after publication is not censoring. [2] http://www.snopes.com is probably the best site for checking urban legends. Search for RFID, for example. Also see news://alt.folklore.urban for discussions on interesting things, and news://alt.fan.cecil.adams for excellent signal-to-news ratio discussions on "why things work". -- Sanjeev _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
